The PHT-S instrumental line profiles have been measured in laboratory. The
profiles exhibit a Gaussian shape to good approximation. For the
PHT-SS pixels
the FWHM is nm, for SL
nm. The
physical distance
between adjacent pixels is 350
m which corresponds to 38.3 nm and
91.8 nm in wavelength for SS and SL respectively, assuming a linear scale.
The physical size of a
pixel in dispersion direction is 310
m which corresponds to a width
in wavelength of 33.9 and 81.3 nm for SS and SL. In
Table 4.5 we have summarized the laboratory data.
Also listed are the fraction of the incident power measured by the detector
pixel in the case the line is centred on a pixel and in case the line falls
exactly in between two pixels of the PHT-S arrays. For these values it is
assumed that the detectors have an ideal flat-topped responsivity profile in
dispersion direction. Since this is not the case (see
Section 4.5.1.3) the ratio between
the centre and adjacent pixel in
case the line is centred on the pixel is somewhat higher. For the values in
Table 4.5 an accurate approximation
for the wavelength scale
is used. For the exact scale see Section 4.6.2.
Under the given
assumptions, a 10% variation in the FWHM changes the fraction in the centre
pixel by less than 7%.
parameter | SS | SL | unit | description |
![]() |
350 | 350 | ![]() |
physical distance between pixels |
![]() |
38.3 | 91.8 | nm | wavelength difference corresponding to pixel distance |
![]() |
310 | 310 | ![]() |
physical pixel size in Z-direction |
![]() |
33.9 | 81.3 | nm | pixel width in wavelength |
FWHM | 42 | 97 | nm | mean full width at half power of profile |
![]() |
4 | 6 | nm | uncertainty in FWHM |
![]() |
0.73 | 0.74 | - | power fraction measured on pixel if line is centred |
![]() |
0.09 | 0.08 | - | power fraction measured on adjacent pixel |
if line is centred | ||||
![]() |
0.43 | 0.43 | - | power fraction on pixel if line is centred |
between two pixels |
The PHT-S wavelength scale, i.e. the relation between pixel number and wavelength, is approximately linear. In orbit calibration confirms the presence of a small second order term. The wavelength scale has been calibrated to an accuracy of less than 1/10 of a pixel (see also Table 4.5) from the analysis of several targets with well defined emission lines. A polynomial fit to the wavelength scale for PHT-SS and PHT-SL gives:
where is the integer pixel number in the SS or SL array, counting from
1 to 64 for both SS and SL. The coefficients
, and
are
presented in Table 4.6.