Next: 5 Optimized PHT observing
Up: General ISOPHOT observing strategies
Previous: 3 Advantages and disadvantages
Telescope nodding using the raster mode with a raster leg separation
dN = 0 arcsec. Applicable in AOTs PHT03, PHT22, and PHT40.
- + long detector stabilisation times since nodding can be
regarded as a very slow chopping
- + continuous exposure
- + observer can select "his own optimal" chopping frequency by setting
the integration time per raster point
- + 2 FCS measurements at beginning and end, no interrupt of
sky-source sequence
- + no chopping avoidance area, if raster oriented relative to sky
- 0 yet to be tested
- 0 time efficiency can be adjusted:
- 2 background positions: sec on-source
( raster) yields 1500 sec
only 1/3 of raster time is on-source:
- bck1 - src - bck2 - bck2 - src - bck1 - bck1 - src - ...
- 1 background position: sec on-source
( raster) yields 1150 sec
1/2 of time on-source:
- bck1 - src - src - bck1 - bck1 - src - src - bck1
- - arrays will be tilted with respect to chop direction if raster
orientation relative to sky is chosen. But spacecraft y-axis
orientation can also be chosen, thereby loosing free selection of
sky orientation.
- C-arrays: 15 arcsec
- PHT-P & PHT-S: on-target flag (OTF) threshold + 3''
currently OTF threshold = 10 arsec -implies 13''
near future OTF threshold = 2 arcsec -implies 5''(to be confirmed)
U. Klaas, P. Ábrahám, M. Haas, U. Herbstmeier and R.J. Laureijs