Up: General ISOPHOT observing strategies
Previous: 4 New features in
Staring observations are currently the best understood and calibrated
observing modes. It is recommended to take the following considerations
into account:
- Note that the logic does not take into account the repeated
observation of the source position: the logic calculates the S/N
for a individual raster pointing, disregarding the repetition
on-source.
- for the C-arrays a maximum raster step size of 1 pixel size or less
to get a proper flat-fielding from the redundancy in coverage of
central position
C100: 46", 23", 15"
C200: 92", 46", 31"
- the following recommended minimum raster dimensions
- PHT-P:
- C100: , 46" raster step size yields a
pixel map with central position covered by all 9 pixels or
, 23" raster step size yields a 1/2 pixel
map with small pixel centred on central position
- C200: minimum , 92" raster step size yields a
pixel map where the central position is covered
by all 4 pixels.
For a better background subtraction use raster with
92" raster step size which yields a pixel map with
the central row of 3 pixels covered by all 4 pixels or use
raster with 46" raster step size yields a
1/2 pixel map with small pixel centred on central
position
- the following recommended integration times per pointing:
- in PHT-P raster sequence (no overlap):
the required detection time
- for staring or nodding sequence:
a minimum of 64 sec, preferentially 128 sec, per pointing
- for C100 raster mode:
a minimum of 40 sec, preferentially 64 sec
due to non-white glitch noise
- for C200 raster mode:
32 s to 64 sec which yield 128 to 256 sec on-source integration
- The chopper frequency in chopper mode is not user selectable. It is
derived by the AOT logic taking into consideration several criteria with
respect to the number of chopper plateaux and number of ramps per chopper
plateau. These criteria are the reset-interval length and the on-source
integration time. The chopper plateau times can be checked using the
ISOPHOT time estimator program ``PHTAOT'' in the output file
``INSTVAR.DAT''.
We acknowledge input or comments by E. Becklin, M. Beckwith, M. Linden-
Voernle, M. Meyer, M. Rowan-Robinson and coworkers, M. Silverstone, and all
visitors of the ISOPHOT data center (MPIA Heidelberg) who complemented
several aspects of our study or brought special items into focus.
Up: General ISOPHOT observing strategies
Previous: 4 New features in
U. Klaas, P. Ábrahám, M. Haas, U. Herbstmeier and R.J. Laureijs