Next:
List of Tables
Up:
lws_hb
Previous:
Contents
List of Figures
2.1.
The LWS with optical path overlay
2.2.
Mirror 2
2.3.
Photograph of the LWS
2.4.
The LWS grating
2.5.
The LWS spectral range
2.6.
LWS flight model filters
2.7.
LWS flight model detector responses
2.8.
Grating efficiency measurements
2.9.
The construction of a Fabry-Pérot etalon
2.10.
FP finesse and transmission as a function of reflectance
2.11.
Drawing of the LWS detector block
2.12.
Integrating amplifier circuit
2.13.
LWS ramps
2.14.
The effect of a bias boost
2.15.
An example of a glitched ramp
3.1.
Modes of the LWS
4.1.
Data processing overview
4.2.
Schematic overview of Derive-SPD
4.3.
Overview of Auto-Analysis
4.4.
Illuminator flash sequence
4.5.
Comparison of OLP 8 and OLP 10 illuminator processing
5.1.
Uranus model
5.2.
Relative Spectral Response Function (RSRF)
5.3.
Derivation of the FPS throughput with Mars `mixed-mode' observations
5.4.
Derivation of the FPL throughput with Mars `mixed-mode' observations
5.5.
Martian rotational modulation detected at 3% level
5.6.
Comparison of IRAS and LWS fluxes at 100
m for a wide range of fluxes
5.7.
Ratio of the IRAS flux to LWS flux at 100
m for various source types
5.8.
LWS versus IRAS flux comparison at 100
m for three different samples
5.9.
LWS versus IRAS flux comparison at 60
m
5.10.
A curved ramp
5.11.
Modelled versus observed photocurrents of Saturn for LW3
5.12.
Strong source corrected spectrum
5.13.
A curved half-second ramp
5.14.
Ramps hitting the ADC rail
5.15.
LW5 SagittariusB2 with quarter- and half-second processing
5.16.
Offset positions of the Mars beam profile observations
5.17.
The mean beam profile for each detector
5.18.
FWHM vs. detector for the four alignments
5.19.
Correction factor for extended sources versus wavelength
5.20.
Comparison of LWS and IRAS 100
m fluxes in Trumpler 14 and 16, and Galactic Centre
5.21.
Model of the point spread function as sampled with the LWS
5.22.
Main LWS grating wavelength standards
5.23.
Deviation of the measured line center
5.24.
Measured grating profiles
5.25.
Gap between plates versus encoded position for FPS and FPL
5.26.
Monitoring data for FPL
5.27.
Velocity residuals for ORION CO lines
5.28.
L01 full grating spectrum of a background position
5.29.
Comparison between serendipity and grating rest observation
5.30.
Parallel map in the Galactic Centre region
5.31.
Comparison between map fluxes and raster fluxes
6.1.
Example of a remaining glitch in the calibrated data
6.2.
Example of fringes in the spectrum of an extended source
6.3.
Example of spectrum fracturing
6.4.
Double-peaked feature in SW1
6.5.
Example of features due to the near-IR leak in the spectrum of Aldebaran
6.6.
Straylight features on LW detectors
6.7.
Examples of transients in fixed-grating observations
6.8.
Variation of transient effect correction parameters with time
6.9.
Result of the transient correction for an extended source
6.10.
Result of the transient correction for a non-extended source
6.11.
Example of `saggy' sub-spectra
6.12.
Stability and systematic errors in the FP wavelength calibration
6.13.
Example of the raw data recorded on a `non-prime' detector
6.14.
Location of the FP `useful' data on the grating profile
6.15.
Comparison of prime and co-added non-prime data
6.16.
FP transmission for orders at wavelengths from
to
6.17.
Grating profile with the contribution from the two FP side orders
ISO Handbook Volume III (LWS), Version 2.1, SAI/1999-057/Dc