next up previous contents index
Next: 2.5 Filters Up: 2. Instrument Description Previous: 2.3 The SW Array

Subsections



2.4 The LW Array

At the time of the ESA Call for `Proposals for ISO instruments', there was no array available in Europe suitable for usage in the long wavelength channel of ISOCAM. A specific development programme was undertaken at the Laboratoire d'imagerie Infrarouge (CEA/LETI) in Grenoble. It led to a 32 $\times$ 32 gallium doped silicon photoconductor array hybridized by indium bumps to a direct voltage readout circuit. The pixel pitch was 100$\mu$m and the detectors were 500$\mu$m thick. A 25 V bias voltage was applied to the photoconductor, providing the optimum trade-off between responsivity and the overhead required to allow for stabilisation of detector response. With this bias voltage, the responsivity at 15$\mu$m was 10$^{14}$ V/W, corresponding to a photoconductive-gain $\times$ quantum efficiency product of  $\eta$ $\cdot$ $G$ $\approx$ 1. To a first approximation, at shorter wavelengths, the responsivity decreased with $\lambda$, and there was a long wavelength cut-off at 18$\mu$m.

To obtain a 100% filling factor, the front surface was doped to ensure a good electrical surface conductivity and the bias voltage was applied to an aluminum frame on the side of the optically sensitive area. An external guard, 3 pixels wide, was added around the 32 $\times$ 32 sensitive pixel frame to prevent field line distortion in the detectors at the edges. The cross-talk was very low, and remained below 1.5%, even for the 12 $^{\prime \prime }$ pfov which had the fastest lens of the camera (numerical aperture $\approx$ f/1).


2.4.1 Readout and integration time (LW)

For each pixel, the readout circuit had an integration capacitance of 0.12 pF and a MOSFET follower stage with a gain of 0.8. A double-sampling readout scheme was used, first resetting the output capacitance and measuring this reset level, then integrating and measuring the level at the end of the integration. The reset level and end of integration level were stored and transmitted to the ground in two separate 32 $\times$ 32 frames. The integration times allowed were: 0.28 s, 2 s, 5 s, 10 s, or 20 s.

As for the SW detector there were three different readout modes:

When the on-chip integration time was 0.28 seconds, four images were averaged on board before being downlinked as the telemetry rate only supported downlinking of one image every second. Only for special calibration measurements was the sampled mode used with 0.28 seconds integration time, in order to get a higher time resolution than in the accumulated mode. Long on-chip integrations were limited by the rate of occurence of cosmic ray induced glitches. The glitch rate was such that the use of the available 20 second on-chip integration time was discouraged during the mission.

Figure 2.4: Gallery of LW saturation remnants (from Boulade & Gallais 2000, [14])
\resizebox {15.5cm}{!}{\includegraphics{sel_rev.ps}}


2.4.2 Noise (LW)

The noise of the array in the LW channel consisted of several components: a high frequency term which is well approximated by a constant readout noise of $\approx$180 e$^-$/pixel rms added to the photon shot noise, and a low frequency term which becomes important only after several tens of readouts (depending on the flux intensity and the integration time). At high level, $> 10^6$ e$^-$/pixel, an amplifier noise becomes dominant and limits the signal-to-noise ratio to $\le 500$ in a single exposure. The optimum performance was obtained with a signal between 2$\times
10^4$ and 1$\times 10^5$ e$^-$/pixel.


2.4.3 Linearity and saturation (LW)

For a given on-chip integration time, the output signal was linear with the incoming flux and saturated above 6$\times 10^5$ e$^-$/pixels. In-flight observations on standard stars showed that the responsivity for different integration times was always the same with an accuracy better than 1% (see Section 4.1.3).

The main effect of a saturation was a decrease of the responsivity in that part of the array which had been overilluminated. This effect was manifested in science observations as an undesirable remnant of any bright source, appearing as a hole compared to the level of the neighbouring background. If no curing of the detector was performed after a saturation event, as was usually the case during ISO operations because of the time constraints, the remnant was observed for a long time after the triggering event. It could take hours or even days for the affected pixels to recover their nominal responsivity. As the effect of the decrease of the responsivity could be observed when the detector was `homogeneously' illuminated, flat-field measurements, such as those performed during the de-activation sequence, were well suited in identifying any serious event which could have occurred inside the revolution and which could have left a trace on the detector. Figure 2.4 gives an example of a gallery of patterns seen in the ICD measurements. The origin of the pattern is indicated in each case.


2.4.4 Gain and encoding (LW)

The on-board readout electronics had 32 independent channels, one for each column of the array. It was based on DC amplifiers followed by sample and hold circuitry. An analogue multiplexer was used to read each line and to encode the signal on 4096 levels. A programmable offset was applied before the analogue to digital converter, and the gain of the chain could be selected from among the 3 factors: 1, 2 or 4, to allow for a good sampling of the noise in low flux conditions, and to take advantage of the whole dynamic range. For general user applications the offset was automatically set, and the observer had to choose the gain; in typical conditions, a gain of 2 was selected, providing 120 e$^-$/ADU and a good sampling of the 1.5 ADU rms of the readout noise over the whole linear range of the array. With this gain, the dynamic range of the system was limited by the analogue to digital converter to $\approx$ 5$\times 10^5$ e$^-$/pixel. In case of a higher signal, a gain of 1 could be selected. Gain 4 was deprecated as it easily led to saturations of the detector, even upon the occurence of moderate glitches.


2.4.5 The missing column (LW)

Column 24 of the LW detector was disconnected. The detector was still active but there was no data available. As the orientation of column 24 on the sky (which varied as a function of satellite revolution) was known only after the observations were scheduled, it was recommended for cases where data was needed across the whole array, to execute raster observations with redundant sky coverage (using a maximum raster-step size of 23 times the pfov in the y-direction). Column 24 ran in the satellite z-direction and was offset from the center of the array in the satellite y-direction (see the ISO Handbook Volume I, [40]).


next up previous contents index
Next: 2.5 Filters Up: 2. Instrument Description Previous: 2.3 The SW Array
ISO Handbook Volume II (CAM), Version 2.0, SAI/1999-057/Dc