next up previous contents index
Next: 5.2 Absolute Flux Calibration Up: 5. Calibration and Performance Previous: 5. Calibration and Performance


5.1 Introduction

We describe here the performance of the instrument together with the calibration processes conducted to convert the raw digitised signal into wavelength and absolute flux units, as well as those designed to derive any instrument characteristics needed to assess the quality of the data and the performance of the instrument.
Some of the calibration processes described here are meant to derive the calibration files which are used in the pipeline processing; others are used to characterise the instrument behaviour.

The calibration of the data comprises different steps:
- The conversion of the raw digitised signal from the detectors and mechanisms into photocurrent at each mechanism position is termed Derive-SPD (Standard Processed Data) (see Section 4.3); it was designed during ground testing and verified in the early phase of the ISO mission. The first stage of processing therefore requires no astronomical calibration and will in general not be discussed here.
- The conversions of mechanism position into wavelength on one hand, and of photocurrent into absolute flux units on the other hand, do require astronomical calibration. These conversions are performed as far as possible in Auto-Analysis (AAL - see Section 4.4).
However, the pipeline processing only derives the true flux for point like sources at the centre of the LWS field of view because it makes no attempt to correct for the angular response of the instrument, (i.e. the beam shape, see Section 5.9), or for any anomalous instrument behaviour such as the channel fringing seen on the spectra of extended or off-axis sources. The fringes and other unwanted effects are described in Chapter 6 and can be corrected for by using dedicated interactive software in LIA (LWS Interactive Analysis - see Section 8).

The accuracy achieved with the calibration and the derived instrument characteristics are given in the tables included in this chapter. Typical accuracy numbers are summarized in Table 5.1.


Table 5.1: Typical accuracies of the different modes of the LWS
Mode Wavelength accuracy Photometric accuracy
Grating 0.25 resolution elem. point sources: 10%-20% depending on flux and detector
(L01 & L02) 0.07 $\mu $m for SW1-SW5 extended sources: 50%
  0.15 $\mu $m for LW1-LW5  
Fabry-Pérot FPS: 6 km s$^{-1}$ line intensity: within 20%
(L03 & L04) FPL: 13 km s$^{-1}$ continuum: to be scaled to the grating flux

For a list and a description of the calibration files, we refer to Section 7.3.


next up previous contents index
Next: 5.2 Absolute Flux Calibration Up: 5. Calibration and Performance Previous: 5. Calibration and Performance
ISO Handbook Volume III (LWS), Version 2.1, SAI/1999-057/Dc